Women World Leaders

Even thogh I am a male I will be glad when women are in power throguhout the world. Males have been in control for thousands of years and we have made a mess of everything. In fact, one of the greatest con jobs in history is that males are the superior sex when in reality, women are not even equal to us males as women are far superior to most males so why not have women in control. We hear that the best man for a job is a WOman and there is a lot of truth to that. Women have shown they can do anything we males can do and they can do it better...MUCH better. Am I distressed that women are so much superior than us males? Not in the least and I am glad women are superior because I would hate for it to be MALES from what I have seen. GO GIRLS! 11

I have learned that the best way for any male to please a woman it to tell the truth

One of the biggest lies in all history is still being told, that is that males are the superior sex. In reality women are no where near equal to men because women are SUPERRIOR to amost any male.

Since many males make women think they are the inferior sex, I gave my daughters a book by Ashley Montagu He made the statement: "The natural superiority of women is a biological fact, and a socially acknowledged reality." One problem is that it is not a "socially acknowledged reality" enough but it was controversial enough as it bruised too many male egos. (the only thing more fragile then our male egos are our testicles)

Even though I am a male too, I knew it as a child just by looking around at the males and women around me that women are the superior gender. His book "The Natural Superiority of Women" should be taught in every junior high school in the country. Maybe than males would learn to respect women and girls better.

I think this would be a good topic for book clubs also and it was written by a male who had nothing to gain by revealing the truth that WOMEN ARE THE SUPERIOR GENDER!.

We need more women as world leaders. In fact, ONLY WOMEN should be the leaders of our world. We males have messed things up long enough (yes I am ashamed to say I am a male because I see what my gender has done to society and to women whom I believe to be superior to males as I see two others here do also.

The male gender is the main reason for wars.

The male gender is a major determinant is a major determinate of public health in the U.S. and Europe and worldwide. Males are at an age adjusted greater risk of premature death than women for causes that should affect men and women equally, although poorly understood biologic differences exist

In reality, the biological differences should be clear, being male is a disease and I think a good part of it rests in their testicles. It is odd how males brag about having balls and the bigger the balls the better yet their own balls often help lead to their early death. I think someone would be nuts to want a pair of nuts between their legs.

Nothing shows that women are superior than war does. George Carlin said:

I look at war a little bit differently. To me, war is a lot of prick-waving! OK? Simple thing. That's all it is. War is a whole lot of men standing out on a field, waving their pricks at one another. Men are insecure about the size of their dicks, and so they have to kill one another over the idea. That's what all that asshole jock bullshit is all about. That's what all that adolescent, macho male posturing, and strutting in bars and locker rooms is all about. It's called "dick fear!" Men are terrified that their pricks are inadequate and so they have to compete with one another, to feel better about them, and since war is the ultimate competition, basically, men are killing each other in order to improve their self-esteem! You don't have to be a historian or a political scientist to see the bigger-dick foreign policy theory at work. It sounds like this: "What, they have bigger dicks? Bomb them!" And of course, the bombs and the rockets and the bullets are all shaped like dicks. It's a subconscious need to project the penis into other people's affairs. It's called "fucking with people!"

So war is really about a lot of pricks shooting other people simply because they too have a prick. Oh but they have to have balls too because you cannot blow the balls of someone who does not have them. I will agree with one thing, if we have wars, only those with a prick and a pair of balls should be placed in harm's way. I would have no objection to letting women blow a male's balls off or even cut them off but keep her safe and let her cut the balls of rapist or terrorist. A male dying to save women has been long practiced. I read about a military unit where ten thousand males surrounded to an enemy that would soon defeat them knowing every male would be killed but the women and girls would be saved. Even though there were about 1,000 women, ten thousand males sacrificed their life because they knew they were be defeated and everyone would be killed so they made a deal that the women would be spared. I guess they knew one woman was worth ten males even if they could not admit women were superior, their actions proved they knew they were

Although I am a male, I want to point out that males have pulled off one of the biggest cons in history by making women believe males are the superior sex. Nothing could be further from the truth as it is women who are the superior sex by a huge magin.

We look at the animal world, we would see the focus is always on the female.

Perhaps the human male can use a lesson from the animal world such as with the Redback Spider. Mating is always fatal for the male Redback because he knows the female is what is important. While the female mates many times in her live time of over 3 years, at least one male always dies when she does. The male mate once as it is always fatal for him and the male lives for only 3 months as opposed to 3 years for her. The male actually forfeits his life to assure the female survives by jumping in front of her knowing she will kill and eat him.

Throughout the natural world, males always have a higher death rate than do the females and we see this in humans also. Does not this show that the female is the superior sex in the animal world and that in humans, women are the superior gender and males are the inferior one? Some of us males are smart enough to realize this and we do not allow our male ego to keep us from accepting that we are not on top as most males think we are but that we are designed to play a supporting role to the stars of our society, women.

I agree that women should be the focal point of all society but I do wonder how many women need to realize women are the star of this play we call life and it is us males that are only supporting members of it.

The Natural Superiority of Women" is a good book that shows solid evidence that women are the superior gender. It starts by showing that every human starts out female but it goes on to say that at one certain stage of development something "goes horribly wrong" and some of us (myself included) end up to be male. In short, we males are a mutation of a female. (Seldom is a mutation good)

One comment stated that the last update of this book was in 1999 and since than a lot more has been learned.

Recently there have been several news items regarding this. Some say males will disappear totally. Others say we will still be around but not really needed. Before machines were invented, males were needed for their muscles for physical work. Now that machines can do all of that, males are not needed as much as we once were.

Now there is a book that can fill in that 21 year gap.

"Man Down" by Dan Abrams

Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt That Women Are Better Cops, Drivers, Gamblers, Spies, World Leaders, Beer Tasters, Hedge Fund Managers, and Just About Everything Else

Someone said that now that women are getting an equal chance, women are surpassing males in almost every area. This is what Abrams said is the reason for this book.

"There’s a lot more evidence now. A lot of the studies from the book are from the last three years. It’s only been in the last twenty or so years, that women have been on a relatively even playing field in terms of work to do many of these studies. We weren’t able to make fair comparisons before, because women were a fraction of the working world. Now we’re see women taking over the majority in many professions. But only recently has there been enough time to look back to compare men versus women and only recently has there been real interest."

Abrams said a vast majority of lead researchers are male, but the broad trend trackers are women. so it may be that males are beginning to wake up and smell the roses that male superiority is history. Actually, males never were superior as women have always been superior to males.

Women have a better sense of smell, taste, and new research is suggesting the fact that women tend to endure pain more makes them more immune to it. It’s the old aphorism, “That which doesn’t kill me makes me stronger.” Women survive injury better than males do and 77% of those who die in traffic accidents are male. Women have 34 more nerve fibers per square centimeter of facial skin, while men have an average of 17. This brings up sexual pleasure. Women have hundreds of times more nerve endings in their vagina than males have in their penis and as a result a male's orgasm pales to a woman's. A woman feels it in all of her body for several moments and it can be repeated many times in a short time. A male's orgasm consists of a few throbs of his penis and it is over in usually much less than a minute. He usually cannot have another one for several hours. Someone said that it is like Niagara Falls for women, a dripping faucet (no pun intended) for males.

Women live an average of five years longer than men. The reasons for this are both genetic and behavior-based. First of all, women have stronger immune systems, again due to estrogen which aids the fight against disease-inducing enzymes. But women are also less likely to engage in risky behavior. Almost all of the Darwin Award winners are male. Usually 9 or more males kill themselves for each woman who does to get this award.

Women make better doctors. While forty percent of doctors are women, 80 percent of those under investigation for medical misconduct or incompetence are male. In the U.S., there were similar findings. Male physicians were twice as likely to be sued as women


He does list things males are better at: Males are better at parking, they’re better dieters, they have better distance vision, and they read maps better. Males do have larger muscles, so they tend to be better at some sports but women far excel males in endurance sports.

A woman's body can more efficiently process oxygen. When it comes to ultra-marathons—say, a 135 mile race without sleep—women can beat men. Remember the first male that ran a marathon died and when we read about someone dying while playing sports or running a race, it is far more likely it will be a male.

When looking at sex change operations, we will notice that a few hundred males want to become women for every woman who wants to become a male. Still these males would not become members of the superior gender as their DNA would still be male thus keeping them inferior to women.

Even in combat, women are better sharp shooters and if the battle of the sexes every turned into a real war, we males would not have a chance. All the males would all be dead while 3/4 or more women remained alive and unharmed.

It is a given that males need women far more than women need males but lets count our lucky stars that most women still want us around.

With Montagu's book, I use to think women had a 80 out of 100 advantage over us males. With his last update in 1999 I raised that to 85 to 100. Now with this new book, it looks like women have a 95 to 100 advantage over males and if it keeps up since women have grown so much in the last 20 to 30 years, soon they will have total advantage over anyone that has the misfortune of being born with testicles although I am one of those that did have this misfortue as I too have testicles but still from what I see around me, I too am glad women are the SUPERIOR gender and MALES are the inferior one.

I was watching Family Feud recently and one of the questions was "What do little GIRLS do better then little BOYS.


The top answer was: EVERYTHING! I agree with this. There is nothing males can do better than women or girls because women and girls are the superior gender and even Family Feud know girls are superior to boys.

I would love to see them ask a follow up question "What can women do better than men" Of course the best answer to that would be EVERYTHING too. If they asked what can men do better than women, the answer should be NOTHING because males can't even keep up with women anymore. Women should and will be the future world leaders and women should be in total control of all aspects of society and in the home.

PS It may suprise you that I am a male who firmly believes women are far superior to us males.

The Wall Street Journal has an article called "The War on Girls" It points out that since 1970 over 163 million girls have been aborted by parents seeking sons. Why anyone would want to abort someone that would be far superior to a male is beyond me.
It goes on to say "In nature, 105 boys are born for every 100 girls. This ratio is biologically ironclad. Between 104 and 106 is the normal range, and that's as far as the natural window goes. Any other number is the result of unnatural events.
Yet today in India there are 112 boys born for every 100 girls. In China, the number is 121—though plenty of Chinese towns are over the 150 mark."
The author states that "such imbalances are portents of Very Bad Things to come. "Historically, societies in which men substantially outnumber women are not nice places to live," she writes. "Often they are unstable. Sometimes they are violent."
Should it be any surprise? The more MALES we have, the worse society becomes? Maybe The S.C.U.M. Manifesto by Valerie Jean Solanas is right. Maybe the best way to cure our problems is to eliminate at least half of the MALE population! After all, if we have a barrel of apples, we do not throw the good apples out to get rid of the rotten ones and in humans, the rotten apples are far more often the MALES. Yes, sometimes we have to throw out some good ones to get all the bad ones but as long as they have testicles, that is fine with me. At least it will be safe for all women and girls since half of the males will be gone. And some wonder why many of us know that women are the superior sex and males are by far the inferior sex.

One thing we know from this article (War on girls) is that there are fewer wars and much less violence when there are far fewer males then women. Would that not tell us the problem is not because of women but because of those who are inferior to women because they have a a PENIS and TESTICLES and the MALE brain that goes with them.

The February 2000 edition of the American Psychiatric Association had a very interesting article regarding Montagu's The Natural Superiority of Women which at much as I hate to admit it, confirmes what many have said here, women are the superior gender.


"the fifth edition, Montagu (1999) says that since the fourth edition of the book appeared in 1992, "much new information bearing on the natural superiority of women has become available" and that "the new findings unexceptionally support and confirm the conclusions reached in this book." He says that he tried to leave the book essentially as it was written, but has brought it up to date with the latest findings and has also added new material.

Over the centuries, male scholars have pointed to the larger male brain, skeleton, height, and muscle mass as clear evidence of the male's superiority, as in the view "might makes right." However, in a paradigm shift that seeks to include the overall performance of the anatomy and physiology of male and female, Montagu believes women come out on top. Women apparently have a more powerful immunological system, which affords them greater protection against and better recovery from starvation, fatigue, shock, and illness. Also, although a woman's brain may be smaller than a man's, it has more neurons in the corpus callosum, which enables better coordination between hemispheres. Consequently, the female brain is more highly developed structurally and functionally, and it is capable of thinking more soundly and intuitively than the male brain, Montagu says. The end result is that women are more insightful and have greater stamina and longevity—or, in other words, women stand the test of time.

In spite of the book's provocative title, Montagu insists it is not his intention to inflate the status of one sex over the other, but rather to bring the sexes closer together. Montagu believes that if we are to achieve social equality, men must be convinced that women are superior. His desire is for a reconstructed American culture in which the male values of physical dominance, acquisition of material goods, and aggression give way to humane attributes and abilities. Women, being the truly superior beings they are, will of course not brag about their biological superiority over men, but will treat them kindly and gently"

Much more has been learned since 1999, the last update of this book and sad for us males to say, even more ways women are superior have been discovered.but maybe he is right when he said "men must be convinced that women are superior"

I am ready to throw in the towel and admit that women are superior and that males are inferior to women

I love all of these comments about women being superior to males because it is a fact. I have gone to many events which it would appear that the males there know it too although most will not admit it. They are CFNM events or clothed female, naked male. All the women are dressed while all the males are totally naked. I have seen one where a male asked a woman to cover her cleavage as she was showing too much but all the time he was totally naked while telling her to cover up. Many of the males have told me they like it because their being nude in front of us women is one way to show they are inferior to us. They point out that when one goes to the doctors and is nude the doctors and nurses stay dressed and they are in a superior postion to them so the CFNM events actually show these males are submitting to our being the superior sex. When I Googled it, CFNM was 140 times more popular than the reverse events.

Why not have only the males be naked? I have watched many National Geographic programs about remote tribes and although about a dozen tribes in various places, there is one thing in common with all of them. The males are totally naked while the women and girls wear skirts. I have seen some of these shows where they have blurred out the breast on women but they leave the male genitals fully in focus. None of these tribes have any problems with women's breast being exposed nor do they have problems with all the males being totally naked. If we did that here, it would eliminate the way some perverts scare little girls by exposing their penis and testicles to them as all the girls would already know what males look like as many would be totally naked anyway. Since in all of these tribes women and girls all wear skirts it would seem there is a natural tendency for women to keep her genitals covered even though it is accepted that the males expose theirs so why not adopt that policy all over the world? There would be another advantage for this too, if any male got sexually aroused by kids, it would be readily apparent and he could be dealt with immediately.

My brother is a shift supervisor in a large factory and he has about two dozen men and a dozen women working for him He states that the women do twice as much as the males and they do it better than the males. If he needs something done right away, he always asks one of the women to do it since he can't depend upon any of the males. If he had his way, he would never hire another male but he would only have women working for him. He now says that women are superior and of course I agree with him.